Legal Opinion

Heid v. Vreeland

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On final hearing on bill, answer and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor.

This case presents but a single question : Is the defendant personally liable for the complainant’s debt ? The bill is filed to enforce the payment of a mortgage for $2,000, made by George R. Blakiston to the complainant, bearing date March 1st, 1873. The mortgaged premises were subsequently conveyed by Blakiston to the defendant, by deed bearing date December 1st, 1873. The bill alleges that this deed contains a covenant whereby the defendant became bound to pay the complainant’s mortgage. The deed is in evidence, and it is the only evidence before the court touching the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Townsend v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reeves v. CordesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  2. International-Great Northern R. v. OehlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Meyer v. BlackerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  4. Friedman v. ZuckermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  5. Reinfeld v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API