Legal Opinion
Reinfeld v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 25, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Complainants Joseph Reinfeld and Fred Neiburg sue to enjoin defendant from prosecuting an action at law for a deficiency on a mortgage bond. They present that they are sureties and not the principal debtors; that the term of the bond and mortgage was extended without their consent or knowledge, and that thereby they were released from liability.
The bond bears date March 18th, 1926, but my statement of the facts must begin three years earlier. In 1923, the complainants and two others decided to buy at foreclosure sale property known as 156 Market street, Newark, and to vest title in a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crowell v. Hospital of Saint BarnabasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1876
- Du Vivier & Co. v. GalliceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- Gorenberg v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
- Friedman v. ZuckermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Heid v. VreelandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1879
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National State Bank of Newark v. Terminal Const. Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1963
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. GottliebNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
- N.J. Title Guarantee Trust Co. v. BerlinerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
- Newark v. Jos. Hollander, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
- Beatty v. Paterson-Garfield-Lodi Bus Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.