Legal Opinion

Bliss v. Rhodes

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 27, 1978No. 77-575PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD

delivered the opinion of the court:

The defendant property owner appeals from a judgment granting specific performance of the sale of his farm land to the plaintiffs based on an offer of purchase. The defendant contends that the remedy was improvidently granted because the offer to purchase contained an insufficient legal description and was otherwise incomplete in its terms; the evidence failed to show payment of earnest money; and under the circumstances surrounding the agreement the court could not equitably order specific performance.

The offer to purchase,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Welsh v. JakstasIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  3. INNKEEPERS INTL., INC. v. McCoy Motels, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Fuchs v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hofmann Company v. MeisnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bissett v. GoochAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Intini v. MarinoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Lakshman v. VecchioneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Guel v. BullockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Kane v. McDermottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API