Legal Opinion
Intini v. Marino
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided January 28, 1983No. 81-2150PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz
Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint for damages and for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate was dismissed with prejudice. They appeal from the order of dismissal and present as the only issue whether the second amended complaint alleged the existence of a valid contract and thereby stated a cause of action for specific performance.
The hearings on defendant’s motion to strike and dismiss the second amended complaint adduced the following:
On December 1, 1979, defendant entered into a written agreement with the House of Realty, Inc., a corporation authorizing it or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pocius v. FleckIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- Brunette v. Vulcan Materials Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- McDaniel v. SilvernailAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Flannery v. Marathon Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Joseph v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Shelly Feldman, Individually and D/B/A Shelly Feldman Associates v. Allegheny International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Gagnon v. SchickelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Alguire v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Podolsky v. Alma Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- White Hen Pantry, Inc. v. Rak Woo ChaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.