Legal Opinion

Kane v. McDermott

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1989No. 4-89-0385PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE McCULLOUGH

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff Paul Kane brought an action seeking specific performance of an option to purchase real estate, contained in a lease between him and his uncle, James McDermott. Defendant, William McDermott, had inherited the property from James McDermott. Defendant opposed specific performance and brought a counterclaim seeking possession of the disputed property and damages. The trial court granted plaintiff specific performance and found for plaintiff on the counterclaim.

Defendant appeals, arguing the trial court abused its discretion…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ullsperger v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Bonde v. WeberIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Welsh v. JakstasIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Threlkeld v. InglettIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Dawdy v. SampleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Zurcher v. HerveatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Lamore Restaurant Group, LLC v. AkersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. White Hen Pantry, Inc. v. Rak Woo ChaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Marder's Nurseries, Inc. v. HoppingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Cooke v. Illinois State Board of ElectionsIllinois Supreme Court · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API