Legal Opinion

Guel v. Bullock

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 28, 1984No. 83-55PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

Plaintiff David Guel sought specific performance of a contract to purchase real estate. Named as defendants were the owner of the property in issue, Karey C. Bullock, and Joseph and Shou-Mei Morris, the ultimate purchasers of the property. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment which was granted, and plaintiff appeals.

On February 6, 1982, plaintiff contracted to buy and defendant Karey Bullock contracted to sell real estate owned by Bullock. The contract described the property as “8427 S. Euclid.” The contract provided that plaintiff would pay $4,500, assume the mortgage on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ullsperger v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Pocius v. FleckIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Gage v. CameronIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Bennett v. RaagAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Callaghan v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Daniels v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kluver v. PPL Montana, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Chariot Holdings, Ltd. v. Eastmet Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Central Illinois Light Company v. Consolidation Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Crawley v. HathawayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API