Legal Opinion

People v. Slater

California Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1898No. Crim. No. 332PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Del Norte County. James E. Murphy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

The defendant was tried upon an information for talcing away from her father a female under the age of eighteen years, without his consent, for the purposes of prostitution. He was convicted, and sentenced to imprisonment at San Quentin for two years and six months, and to pay a fine of one thousand dollars, and he now appeals from said judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

1. A venire was issued for thirty jurors, and it was served by the sheriff. The defendant challenged the panel upon the ground that the sheriff was examined as a witness on behalf of the people upon the…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Reagan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  2. Bynum v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  3. People v. FreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. People v. MarronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. United State Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API