Brost v. L.A.N.D., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPetrie, J.
When defendants Hales sought foreclosure of their mortgage against defendant L.A.N.D., Inc., in July 1975, they failed to include as party defendants the plaintiffs herein, Brosts, contract vendees of lot 3, one of the lots in the property foreclosed. Brosts' contract was later in time to Hales' mortgage, but it was recorded before foreclosure commenced. The public notice of the sheriff's sale did not comply with the provisions of RCW 6.24.010. Within a month after the sale in January 1976, Hales became aware that Brosts claimed some interest in lot 3. Hales purchased the property at the sale…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McKnight v. BasilidesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Crodle v. DodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Auve v. WenzlaffWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Valentine v. Portland Timber & Land Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Johnson v. SchultzWashington Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ward v. Richards & Rossano, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Young v. EmbleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Carrillo v. City of Ocean ShoresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Carrillo v. City of Ocean ShoresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- In Re the Marriage of HunterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.