Legal Opinion

Grasso v. Crowhurst

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1945No. Civ. No. 3680PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAKE, District Judge.

This proceeding is founded on the provisions of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, Title SO U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 308. The petitioner is an honorably discharged soldier of the United States Army and seeks to return to the position of a tacker at respondents’ tannery, which position he left on induction into the Army.

Two issues of fact are involved predicated on the evidence, and it may be well to explain more fully the factors which have resulted in the pertinent conclusions arrived at.

The first question to be answered bears on petitioner’s fitness for his…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grasso v. CrowhurstCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  2. Kent v. Todd Houston Shipbuilding Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API