Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Sheldon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1917No. Docket No. 100PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Ingham; Collingwood, J. Assumpsit by W. A. Harrington, administrator of the estate of Milo Marsh, deceased, against Charles Sheldon for rent. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of Milo E. Marsh, deceased, to recover of defendant for. rents claimed to be due to said estate for the use of certain premises by defendant. The facts are not in dispute. On January 22, 1909, Milo E. Marsh, widower, executed and delivered to Harry L. Bird and Cora M. Bird, husband and wife, a warranty deed of the premises in question, which deed contained the following provision:

“Excepting and reserving to first party, however, a life estate for and during his own life in said premises.”

This deed was recorded on January…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lee v. PayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Bertram v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Guthmann v. ValleryNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Hoagland v. CrumIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Bertram v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McMorran Milling Co. v. C. H. Little Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Bugajski v. SiwkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Marks v. Corliss' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API