Legal Opinion

Bugajski v. Siwka

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1918No. Docket No. 190PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit by John Bugajski and another against John Siwka for breach of a land contract. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict for less than the amount claimed. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action of assumpsit to recover damages for nonperformance by the defendant, the vendor, of a written land, contract. The parties are all Polish people. On or about February 1, 1910, the plaintiffs, husband and wife, being desirous of purchasing a home for themselves, went to the defendant, who claimed to be the owner of a house and lot known as No. 1271 Chene street in the city of Detroit. After an examination of the premises a written contract was entered into by the parties, béaring date February 1, 1910. By the terms of the contract the defendant (party of the first part) in consideration…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Way v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Lowe v. HarwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  3. Allen v. AtkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Miller v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Ortmann v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kammert Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Lunde v. MinchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. August v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Kennedy v. BradyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API