Legal Opinion
Garrido v. Air Liquide Industrial U.S. LP
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 26, 2015No. B254490PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
Plaintiff and respondent Mario Garrido entered into an agreement with his employer, defendant and appellant Air Liquide Industrial U.S. LP (Air Liquide). The agreement provided that all disputes arising out of Garrido’s employment with Air Liquide would be resolved by arbitration, and the agreement prohibited class arbitration.
After being terminated, Garrido filed a class action complaint against Air Liquide, alleging various Labor Code violations and unfair business practices. The trial court denied a motion to compel arbitration brought by Air Liquide, finding that the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nieto v. Fresno Beverage Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Muro v. Cornerstone Staffing Solutions, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Muller v. Roy Miller Freight Lines, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Betancourt v. Transportation Brokerage Specialists, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Doss v. TeslaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.