Legal Opinion
Nieto v. Fresno Beverage Co.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided March 7, 2019No. F074704PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDetjen, Acting P.J.
*276*70Plaintiff Daniel Nieto was employed for many years as a delivery driver for defendant Fresno Beverage Company, Inc., doing business as Valley Wide Beverage Company (VWB). After being terminated from his employment, Nieto filed a class action lawsuit against VWB alleging various wage and hour violations under California labor law. VWB responded by filing a petition to compel arbitration, since Nieto had signed a written arbitration agreement when he was hired. VWB argued that under the Federal Arbitration Act ( 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., the FAA) Nieto must be ordered to arbitrate the dispute in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bernadean Rittmann v. amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Immediato v. Postmates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Muller v. Roy Miller Freight Lines, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Ali v. Daylight Transport, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Ali v. Daylight Transport, LLC CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.