Legal Opinion
Muro v. Cornerstone Staffing Solutions, Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided February 23, 2018No. D070206PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDato, J.
*787Plaintiff Tony Muro entered into an employment contract with defendant Cornerstone Staffing Solutions, Inc. (Cornerstone). The contract included a provision requiring that all disputes arising out of Muro's employment with Cornerstone to be resolved by arbitration. It also incorporated a class action waiver provision. In response to Muro's present action, which *788was styled as a proposed class action and alleged various Labor Code violations, Cornerstone moved to compel arbitration and dismiss the class claims.
Relying heavily on Garrido v. Air Liquide Industrial, U.S. LP (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Gentry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nieto v. Fresno Beverage Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Muller v. Roy Miller Freight Lines, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Bahamonde v. Amazon.com Services LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Betancourt v. Transportation Brokerage Specialists, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Doss v. TeslaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.