Commonwealth v. Albert
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
Michael Zaiden, Phillip Albert, and three others, all members of the Election Board of the Second District of the Third Ward of the city of Pittsburgh, were indicted for violating the Election Laws and being parties to a conspiracy.
Indictment No. 145, February Sessions 1942, containing ten counts, charged the five persons named therein with various violations of the Election Laws at the November Election of 1941. Albert was convicted on the first, second, third, fifth, seventh, and eighth counts of the indictment and Zaiden was convicted ’on the second, fifth, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AnticoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Com. of Pa. v. KlineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Commonwealth v. RosenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth v. RheySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Commonwealth v. CoverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ParrottoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. SCHWARTZSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. KUBACKISuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Commonwealth v. EspositoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. ArmbrusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.