Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cover

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1924No. Appeal, 174PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

It is not necessary to pass upon all of the many assignments of error filed in this appeal. At least two must be sustained and require a reversal of the judgment.

Appellant was jointly tried and convicted with four others, (Lysett, Quinn, Pohl and Havener), of violating the provisions of the Act of May 25, 1921, P. L. 1125, which amended section 15 of the Act of July 12, 1913, P. L. 719, regulating primary elections, as amended by the Act of July 9, 1919, P. L. 839.

The indictment charged in substance that Lysett was the judge of election, Quinn and Pohl the inspectors of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SylvanusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Commonwealth v. DegnanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PaddenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Commonwealth v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Commonwealth v. CoverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API