Legal Opinion

Henry v. Weinman

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1958No. Civ. 22559PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERNDON, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiff appeals from a judg ment that she .recover nothing upon her alleged causes of action seeking damages for breach of contract and for fraud. The cause was tried before the court without a jury. In its findings of fact, the trial court found that the alleged contract was nonexistent and that the allegations of fraud were untrue.

Plaintiff and Alexander Dollar, hereinafter sometimes referred to as the testator, were married in 1945. Alexander Dollar died on June 21, 1952, leaving a will which antedated his marriage to plaintiff. It is undisputed that as to plaintiff…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Div. of Labor Law Enf't v. Transpacific Transp. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. N. Litterio & Company, Inc. v. Glassman Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  3. Greene v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. MacIsaac & Menke Co. v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Div. of Labor Law Enf't v. Transpacific Transp. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API