Legal Opinion
Power Resource Group, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided January 10, 2002No. 03-01-00187-CVPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAN P. PATTERSON, Justice.
In this appeal, we must determine whether the Public Utility Commission of Texas erred in interpreting its substantive rule 23.66, governing the obligation of electric utilities to purchase energy and capacity from qualifying facilities. 1 Power Resource Group, Inc., challenges the Commission’s refusal to find a requirement in the rule imposing upon utilities an obligation to enter into contracts offered by qualifying facilities incapable of providing energy or capacity within ninety days of such offer.
In Texas, the primary enforcer of the Public Utility Regulatory…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Spoljaric v. Percival Tours, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Springs Window Fashions Division, Inc. v. Blind Maker, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Reliant Energy, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Exelon Wind 1, L.L.C. v. Donna Nelson, et aCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Power Resource Group, Inc. v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.