Legal Opinion

Toland v. Toland

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1898No. Sac. No. 449PublishedCited by 24 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of SolanoCounty. ' A. J. Buckles, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The plaintiff brings this action against the-defendants to quiet his title to the undivided half of certain land in the county of Solano, claiming the same by succession from Mary B. Toland, who died seised of said land November 14, 1895. In answer to the plaintiffs claim the defendants allege that Mrs. Toland made a testamentary disposition of the-land, and that they are the beneficiaries under her said will, set*142ting forth in their answer a copy of the will. The plaintiff demurred to this answer, and, his demurrer having been sustained, judgment was entered in his favor, from which the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Le Breton v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Thornagel v. PforrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Spriggs v. SpriggsMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Campbell v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API