Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 9, 1970No. Appeals, Nos. 205 and 216PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Pomeroy,
In this case the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh (the Authority) condemned two leasehold interests of Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Corporation (Outdoor) in a building, the fee of which had already been acquired by the Authority by purchase from the owner. The problem presented on this appeal is the proper method of valuing these leasehold interests, that is, Outdoor’s right to remain in undisturbed possession of the premises for the remainder of the term of the lease. It is the loss of this right for which compensation is payable to the condemnee.1
Ea…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McSorley v. Avalon Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Hoffman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Profit-Sharing Blue Stamp Co. v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Getz v. Philadelphia & Reading RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Shaaber v. Reading CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. Central Expressway Sign AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Glosser Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Graham Realty Co. v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- LaMar Advertising of South Dakota, Inc. v. Heavy Constructors, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Department of InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.