Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Vivid, Inc. v. Fiedler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1998No. 96-1900PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

¶1. This case involves the question of the proper determination of just compensation for outdoor advertising signs, owned by Vivid, Inc. (Vivid), that the State of Wisconsin removed in 1989 in conjunction with a highway improvement project along Interstate 90. Three issues are presented. 1) Does Wis. Stat. § 84.30 provide the exclusive remedy for just compensation for these signs? We conclude it does. 2) Does just compensation for the taking of these signs include the value of the location of the signs? We conclude it does. 3) What is the appropriate method for determining just compensation…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. State v. PharrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Anderson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Calero v. Del Chemical Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. Central Expressway Sign AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. Charles E. ButtsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Rademann v. State Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  5. Koskey v. Town of BergenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API