Legal Opinion

Citizens Nat. Bank v. Forman's Assignee

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 7, 1901PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Case 25 — Action to Recover Double the Amount oe Usurious Interest Alleged to Have Been Paid to Defendant APPEAL FROM BOYLE CIRCUIT COURT. Judgment for Defendant and Plaintiff Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

JUDGE DuRELLS

Reversing.

This was an action brought by appellee, as assignee for the benefit of the creditors of W. M. Forman, under section 5198 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, to recover of appellant bank double the amount of certain payments claimed to have been made of usurious interest by Forman to the bank upon a loan by the bank to For-man of $3,117.84 on January 29, 1895. A pleading called a “special demurrer in the nature of a plea in abatement” was filed in the clerk’s office at the same time with an-answer. The filing of these pleadings was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brown v. Marion National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. McBroom v. Scottish Mortgage & Land Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Stout, Goldsborough & Perry v. Ennis National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Kendall v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  5. Hall v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Watson's Exr. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Hummer's Extx. v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  3. Western Bank & Trust Co. v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Anderson v. TatroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Walker v. VandiverTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API