Hall v. First National Bank
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Clay county. Tried below before Morris, J. cited: Schuyler Nat. Bank v. Bollong, 24 Neb., 828; Monongahela Nat. Bank v. Overholt, 96 Pa. St., 327. cited: Brown v. Bank, 72 Pa. St., 209; F. & M. Bank v. Bearing, 91 U. S., 29; Barnett v. Bank, 98 Id., 555; Renee v. Uhl, 11 Neb., 322.
1Opinion of the CourtNor val, J.
The plaintiff in error brought this action against the defendant in error to recover the penalty under section 5198 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, for knowingly receiving usurious interest. The answer denies all charges of usury. Upon the trial the court directed a verdict for the defendant.
*100A statement of the facts, as shown by the record, will be necessary to a correct understanding of the case. On June 1, 1886, the defendant bank commenced business, being the successor of the Fairfield Bank. The defendant purchased from the Fairfield Bank notes of the plaintiff aggregating…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Davis v. NelighNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by11 opinions
- Miller v. Oklahoma State Bank of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Citizens Nat. Bank v. Forman's AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Merchants' & Planters' Nat. Bank v. HortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- McCarthy v. First National Bank of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- McDonald v. AufdengartenNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.