Legal Opinion

Stout, Goldsborough & Perry v. Ennis National Bank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1887No. 2370PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal from Ellis. Tried below before the Hon. Anson Rainey.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

The appellants, Stout, Golds-borough and Perry, bring this suit as partners to recover from the Ennis National Bank a penalty based on a claim that they paid to the bank usurious interest.

The action is brought under an act of Congress prescribing the rate of interest which national banks may charge, and..giving penalties against them for taking, receiving or charging interest greater than the law permits. Under that act, such banks may, in this State, take, receive or charge interest not greater than twelve per cent per annum. So much of the act as provides…

2Cited by38 opinions

  1. Stone v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Rosetti v. LozanoTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Clark v. GreySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. Rose v. O'KeefeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. Rushing v. Citizens' National Bank of PlainviewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API