Legal Opinion
McNicholas v. Bickford
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 26, 1992PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
The defendants, Stephan Bickford, a caseworker for the Department of Human Services (DHS), and Bryan T. Lamoreau, a deputy sheriff for Kennebec County, appeal, and the plaintiff, Regis McNicholas, Jr., cross-appeals from the orders of the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Chandler, J.), denying in part and granting in part the defendants’ motions for summary judgments on McNicholas’s complaint. 1 Because we agree with the defendants that the trial court erred in determining there was a genuine issue as to the material fact of whether McNicholas had good cause for not serving…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- David Glen Meyers v. Contra Costa County Department of Social Services, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Robert A. Borucki v. W. Michael Ryan, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rideout v. RiendeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Rios v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Jenness v. NickersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Brown v. OsierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Louise Dorr v. Sarah WoodardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.