Legal Opinion

Rios v. Montgomery County

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 7, 2005No. 71, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

This case arises under the 180-day notice provision of the Local Government Tort Claims Act [hereinafter “LGTCA”], Md.Code (1987, 2002 Repl.Vol., 2004 Cum.Supp.), § 5-304 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article. 1 We have been asked to determine whether the 180-day notice provision as applied to minors violates the Federal Constitution and Article 19 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights. We also have been asked to review the Circuit Court’s holding that the “good cause” exception contained in Section 5-304(c) of the LGTCA was not satisfied under the facts of this case. Because we find…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. DiPino v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Lee v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Cooper v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Prince George's County v. LongtinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Smith v. DanielczykCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Georgia Pacific Corp. v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API