Legal Opinion
Brown v. Osier
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 9, 1993PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Carl M. Brown appeals from the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Lipez, J.) judgment dismissing his action on the ground of res judicata. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.
After serving as a boiler operator for over ten years at the Governor Baxter School for the Deaf (the “School”), Brown retired at the age of 71. Brown thereafter filed a complaint with the Maine Human Rights Commission, alleging that he was forced to retire because of his age. The Commission found that no age discrimination had occurred, and dismissed the complaint. The same…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gray v. LackeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Donald Roy, of Waterville, Kennebec County, State of Maine v. The City of Augusta, MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Leonard J. Rose v. Town of HarwichCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kirkhart v. KeiperOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Lamb v. GeovjianSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Camps Newfound/Owatonna Corp. v. Town of HarrisonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Guerrero v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services v. DohertyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.