Legal Opinion

Rideout v. Riendeau

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 13, 2000PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, J.

[¶ 1] We are called upon here to determine whether Maine’s Grandparents Visitation Act violates the constitutional rights of competent parents who choose not to have their children visit with their grandparents. We conclude that the Act, as applied to the facts presented to us, is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest, and thus does not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

[¶ 2] The grandparents before us, Rose and Chesley Rideout, appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Saga-dahoc County, Humphrey, J.) affirming an…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. In Re K.H.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Blixt v. BlixtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Roth v. WestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. In Re Scott S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. In Re Parentage of CAMAWashington Supreme Court · 2005

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API