Legal Opinion

Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1972No. Civ. 13178PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORONY, J. *

This case involves the taxation of a mutual water company under the provisions of the California franchise tax law relating to cooperative associations. Such an association is allowed certain special deductions in computing its taxable income. All income from its business activities for or with the association’s members or on a nonprofit basis with nonmembers is excludable from its gross income. However, the expenses incurred in producing such excludable gross income are not deductible in computing its taxable net income. (Rev. & Tax. Code, §§ 24401, 24405, 24421 and 24425.)

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Kahn v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. City of Costa Mesa v. McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. California State Restaurant Assn. v. WhitlowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Herbert Hawkins Realtors, Inc. v. MilheiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API