Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Mosteller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 9, 1988No. 303PA87PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

Plaintiff, as executor of the estate, instituted this declaratory judgment action seeking an interpretation and construction of the will of Gordon Henry Baker. The trial court found that Item Five of the testator’s will, which purported to distribute the residue of the estate, was ineffective because its condition precedent was not satisfied. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court, holding that the residue of the testator’s estate passed under the will by implication. We allowed the collateral heirs’ petition for discretionary review and now reverse the decision of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Little v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Faison v. . MiddletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Gordon v. . EhringhausSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Wing v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., NASupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. McCain v. WombleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hammer v. HammerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. North Carolina National Bank v. AppleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Halstead v. PlymaleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Jasper v. Eastern Band of Cherokee IndiansCherokee Indian Tribal Court · 2012
  5. Parks v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API