Tourte v. Horton Manufacturing Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued for injuries arising out of the operation of a Horton washing-machine and wringer. The cause was tried before a jury and, at the close of plaintiff’s case, the trial judge granted a nonsuit. The plaintiff appeals on typewritten transcripts. Washer Wilson, Inc., was the only defendant served with process, hence the appeal relates to the interest of that party only.
Washer Wilson, Inc., was engaged in the business of selling the Horton washer with wringer attached and with the consent of appellant left a machine at her house, for trial. Prior thereto an agent of respondent…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Tremeroli v. Austin Trailer Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Kirkland v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MarhenkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Phillip Burgess v. Montgomery Ward and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Ebbert v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.