Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Marhenke

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 24, 1941No. 9634PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries, tried before the court without a jury. Findings and judgment were for the plaintiff in the sum of $5,000. Defendant appeals.

Plaintiff was scalded by hot water leaking from a rubber hot water bag purchased from the appellant by the parents of plaintiff, who was an infant fourteen days old at the time of the injury.

The judgment was based upon the finding that the appellant knew, or should have known, that the hot water bag was in a condition which made it unsafe for its intended use. The defect in the bag, as presented…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Stoner v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Tourte v. Horton Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Pigott v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Belknap Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  2. McKay v. Rockwell International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Lockett v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Vallis v. Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Martin v. SchoonoverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API