Legal Opinion

State v. Lambert

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 26, 1995No. C 92-12-37163; CA A79534PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The state appeals the trial court’s order suppressing evidence seized from an apartment that was searched with the consent of one of its occupants. The trial court held that the occupant did not have the authority to consent. We disagree and reverse.

In response to information about illegal drug activity at apartment number 114 of a northwest Portland apartment complex, officer Uehara and two other Portland police officers arrived at that apartment and knocked on the door. A woman who identified herself as Jessica Babcock answered the door. Uehara asked Babcock if she lived there, and Babcock…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. CarseyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. ReadyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. NourseKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API