Legal Opinion

State v. Fuller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 17, 1999No. 9602-31291; CA A94645PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*503WOLLHEJM, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for delivery and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence and statements obtained during a search and seizure of his personal effects. We review for errors of law, ORS 138.220, and reverse and remand for a new trial.

We state the facts as found by the trial court where there is evidence in the record to support them. Where the trial court failed to expressly articulate a factual finding, we assume that it decided the facts in a manner consistent with…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. Juarez-GodinezOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. CarseyOregon Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BonillaOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. CramptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. VoylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. BonillaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API