State v. Keen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
By his sole assignment of error defendant contends the trial court committed prejudicial error in failing to strike certain testimony of Dr. J. D. Danoff. We find merit in this assignment and hold that defendant is entitled to a new trial.
Dr. Danoff, a professor in the Department of Psychiatry at East Carolina University School of Medicine, who observed and treated Langley in the Pitt Memorial Hospital for approximately eight days, testified as a witness for the State. It was stipulated that Dr. Danoff was an expert “in the general field of psychiatry with a specialty in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. ThackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. LedfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- State v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Moor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.