State v. Beeman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
*430Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of one count of felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270. On appeal defendant raises, among other issues, two assignments of error pertaining to the denial of motions for judgment of acquittal that both, in essence, raise the same constitutional question: does either the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, or Article I, section 27, of the Oregon Constitution limit the government's power to criminalize the actual, or constructive, possession of a firearm by a felon in their home? As discussed below, we recognize that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. SkoienCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. YanceyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- State v. FriesOregon Supreme Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ParrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- State v. ShelnuttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. ParrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023