United States v. Yancey
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Matthew Yancey pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm as an unlawful user of marijuana but reserved the right to argue on appeal that the offense of conviction, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), violates the Second Amendment as interpreted in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570,128 S.Ct. 2783, 171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008). We conclude that the statute is constitutional and affirm Yancey’s conviction.
Police officers executed an arrest warrant for Yancey in June 2008. Yancey, who was 18 at the time, was carrying a loaded pistol and 0.7 grams of marijuana. He confessed that he had been smoking marijuana…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Michael Moore v. Lisa MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Rickey I. Kanter v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- National Rifle Ass'n of America, Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & ExplosivesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. MasciandaroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Daniel Binderup v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.