Legal Opinion
State v. Parras
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 7, 2023No. A174543PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
246 Argued and submitted March 17, affirmed June 7, petition for review denied November 2, 2023 ( 371 Or 511) STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RUDY NINO PARRAS, Defendant-Appellant. Crook County Circuit Court 19CR11103; A174543
531 P3d 711
Defendant was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm under ORS 166.270. He moved for a judgment of acquittal, arguing that ORS 166.270 is unconstitutional, as applied to him, because the right to bear arms is a fun- damental right subject to strict scrutiny and his underlying felonies were “non- violent” felonies. He contends that,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. BruenSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- De Veau v. BraistedSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Portland v. SottileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- State v. H. N.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- State v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- City of Portland v. SottileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- Mohiadeen v. Washington County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.