Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. & Maryland Casualty Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernard P. McCaffrey, J.
Motion for an order pursuant to CPLR 7510 confirming the award of1 the arbitrators, and directing that judgment be entered thereon, pursuant to CPLR 7514 (subd. [a]), is granted.
The arbitration award in question was the result of a hearing pursuant to an arbitration agreement to which petitioner and respondent insurance companies aré parties. The matter being arbitrated was that of a property damage claim allegedly sustained to the automobile of Dorothy C. Johnson, to which *411the respondent Maryland Casualty Company became subrogated. The petitioner Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. upon the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Finsilver, Still & Moss, Inc. v. Goldberg, Maas & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Matter of Arcadu v. LevinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Teper v. RackmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shire Realty Corp. v. SchorrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Baldwin v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Whitlock v. Triangle Grading Contractors Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010