Legal Opinion
Matter of Arcadu v. Levinson
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
A motion was made in Special Term under Civil Practice Act, § 1457, to vacate the award of arbitrators on a submission to arbitration. The motion was denied. The Appellate Division reversed on the law and the facts and granted the motion on the ground of the " evident partiality ” of one of the arbitrators. An appeal to this court was taken without leave of the Appellate Division. We are asked to review the facts as found by the Appellate Division under the provisions of Civil Practice Act, § 589, subd. 2. (Matter of Flagler, 248 N. Y. 415.)
Under Civil Practice Act, § 1456, a motion may be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Bullard & Morgan H. Grace Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Matter of FlaglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Stefano Berizzi Co. v. KrauszNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Van Arsdale v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- In re the Arbitration of PickerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Morris White Fashions, Inc. & Susquehanna Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- President Self Service, Inc. v. Affiliated Restaurateurs, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- In re the Arbitration between Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. & Maryland Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1973
- Matter of Vim Electric Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Plowden v. ManganielloNew York Supreme Court · 1989