Legal Opinion
Teper v. Rackman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 30, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Defendants have appealed from an order of the Albany Special Term of the Supreme Court denying their motion for dismissal of the complaint under subdivision 5 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, upon the ground that there exists a final judgment determining the cause of action stated in the complaint. On March 4, 1941, an automobile owned and operated by plaintiff collided with an automobile owned by the defendant Falkow and operated by the co-defendant, as a result of which it is said that plaintiff sustained personal injuries. Plaintiff had collision insurance and his insurance…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Edgar T. Weekes v. Atlantic National Ins. Co., California State Auto Association v. Atlantic National Ins. Co., Atlantic National Ins. Co. v. California State Auto AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Rosenthal v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
- Baldwin v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re the Arbitration between Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. & Maryland Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1973
- Weekes v. Atlantic National Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966