Legal Opinion

Carnahan v. Tousey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1882No. 8010PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Superior Court of Marion County.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

— The only question discussed by the appellants is .the sufficiency of the complaint on which judgment was rendered against them. The complaint, so far as its averments need be rehearsed, shows that Carnahan and Finch purchased of Spiegel a tract of land, which was subject to a mortgage made by Spiegel. In the deed of Spiegel to the appellants, which they accepted, it was stipulated that the appellants should assume and pay the mortgage debt. Carnahan afterwards conveyed his interest in the land to Finch, by a deed which also contained an agreement that Finch should assume and pay the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miller v. BillingslyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Kelly v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Davis v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. McDill v. GunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Davis v. CallowayIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gadbury v. Ohio & Indiana Consolidated Natural & Illuminating Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Irwin's Bank v. Fletcher, Etc., Trust Co., Rec.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Williams v. MarklandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Harvey v. LowryIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Stevens v. FlannaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API