Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Kelly

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1961No. 7376PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in which petitioners, City of Phoenix, a municipal corporation, City of Tempe, a municipal corporation and City of Tucson, a municipal corporation, seek by mandamus to compel J. W. Kelly, Treasurer of the state of Arizona, to pay petitioners certain moneys as directed by A.R.S. § 42-1341, subd. D (Supp.1961). An alternative writ was granted on July 26, 1961 commanding the Treasurer to so distribute the moneys or show cause why he had not paid petitioners 25% instead of 10% of funds on hand after July 1, 1961.

Section 42-1341 formerly read as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Board of Technical Registration v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Van Veen v. County of GrahamArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Street v. Commercial Credit Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Prescott v. Town of Chino ValleyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. Church v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Gortarez v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Karol v. Board of Education TrusteesArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. BridgeforthArizona Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API