Legal Opinion

Karol v. Board of Education Trustees

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1979No. 14081-PRPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

The appellants are four probationary teachers (teachers) whose employment was not continued by the appellee Board of Education (board). The teachers filed a special action in the superior court alleging that the open-meeting law, A.R.S. § 38-431, et seq., was violated and that their contracts were automatically renewed as a result thereof. The court found that the open-meeting law had been violated, but concluded that the board’s intention not to continue the teachers was still operative and binding. The teachers appealed, arguing that the board could not have legally formulated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Powers v. IsleyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. City of Phoenix v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Sanders v. FolsomArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Karol v. Board of Education/TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Riggin v. Bd. of Trust. of Ball State Univ.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. City of Prescott v. Town of Chino ValleyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Long v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. City of Prescott v. Town of Chino ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. Gutierrez v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API