Legal Opinion

Lilly v. Boswell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 11, 1951No. 42240PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHollingswobth, J.

This is an action to' recover damages in the sum of $25,000 for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff (respondent) in an automobile collision. The case was submitted under the humanitarian doctrine. Following a verdict for $1750, plaintiff filed a limited motion for neiv trial of the issue of damages only on the ground the verdict was grossly inadequate, which motion the court sustained; Defendants appeal, assigning as error: (1) that plaintiff failed to make a submissible case, and (2) the sustaining of plaintiff’s limited motion for new trial on the issue of damages.

The evidence is…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Buehler v. Festus Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. Yeaman v. StormsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Bailey v. Interstate Airmotive, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  5. Smith v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Moore v. Ready Mixed Concrete CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Hurlock v. Park Lane Medical Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Wilson v. ToliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. Yarrington v. LiningerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API