Legal Opinion

Yarrington v. Lininger

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 14, 1959No. 46942PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOCKARD, Commissioner.

Defendants Edith Wareham and Elsie Bucholz have appealed from a judgment for plaintiff in the amount of $25,000 in an action for damages resulting from a three- car automobile collision. The judgment was also entered against defendant Arthur Irvin Lininger, but his appeal, although timely taken, has not been perfected.

Plaintiff’s case against Lininger was submitted to the jury on primary negligence; her case against Mrs. Elsie Bucholz was submitted upon negligence under the humanitarian rule; and her case against Mrs. Edith Wareham was based on the contention that Mrs.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Banks v. Morris CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  2. Vietmeier v. VossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Yeaman v. StormsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Perkins v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. Lilly v. BoswellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. HarmsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Brickner v. Normandy Osteopathic Hospital, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Epple v. Western Auto Supply Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  4. Bauman v. ConradMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Osborn v. McBrideSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API