Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kansas City Public Service Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 17, 1931PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtwood, C. J.

This appeal was first heard in Division Number 2 where an opinion was written by Commissioner. Cooley.. One judge concurring, another voting duhiiante and .the third judge being1 absent, tbe cause was transferred to Court en Banc, where it was heard and the divisional opinion adopted as the opinion of the Court en Banc. ' It appearing that error alleged in defendant’s motion for a new trial, but not presented in Division and therefore not dealt with in the opinion, was presented at this hearing en Banc, respondent’s motion for rehearing was sustained and after this rehearing the case came to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Eppstein v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Benjamin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. Ellis v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Smoot v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  5. Dutcher v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Smithers v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. Lilly v. BoswellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Hildreth v. KeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Long v. MildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Frandeka v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API