Legal Opinion

Miller v. Estep

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1928No. 508PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff in error will be called plaintiff and the defendants in error will be called defendants. Plaintiff brought suit against R. J. Estep Co., contractors, and the city of Abilene, for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her by reason of the negligence of the defendants in refilling a sewer ditch and failing to restore the surface of the alley through which the ditch was dug to the same condition as it was before the excavation was made. The case was submitted to the jury on special issues, which, together with the answers thereto, were as follows:

"Special…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hart v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  2. French v. SabinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Yoes v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Alexander v. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Fowler v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Big Six Oil Co. v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Valdez v. Yellow Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Tallabas v. Wing ChongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Jones v. St. JohnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Lanius v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API