Legal Opinion

Lanius v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 8, 1928No. 455PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickman, C. J.

' Appellants sued appel-lee for damages to a herd of cattle being driven by appellants’ employees across the right of way and track of appellee. Some of the cattle were killed by appellee’s train and others were damaged. Expenses were .incurred by appellants for gathering the herd after a stampede brought about by appel-lee’s train. Various specific allegations of negligence on the part of the persons in charge of appellee’s train were made in the petition. Appellee pleaded specifically various grounds of contributory negligence. The' case was submitted to the jury on .special issues. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yoes v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Alexander v. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Sellers v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Miller v. EstepCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Lancaster v. GonzalesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allen v. Texas N. O. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Big Six Oil Co. v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Jones v. St. JohnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Reeves v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Stamford & Western Gas Co. v. StarkeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API