Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Thompson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 9, 2001No. CIV. A. 00-2724(GK)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs are designers, sellers, and manufacturers of dietary supplement for mulations containing folic acid. 1 They bring this action against Defendants Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), in his official capacity; HHS; Bernard A. Schwetz, Acting Principal Deputy Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), in his official capacity; the FDA; and the United States of America. 2
Plaintiffs previously filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, seeking to enjoin the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Pearson v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- National Center for Manufacturing Sciences v. Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Assassination Archives & Research Center v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Taylor v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Whitaker v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Martin v. Omni Hotels Management CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Alliance for Natural Health US v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Alliance for Natural Health US v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.